data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b622/2b622f122a69b36d161a331465225e6b2556a0e1" alt=""
Preliminary testing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18f04/18f046c333d216c6b36dff2715f4c4b07480727d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73491/734913687878b3758ae9be9fbaef984d75069580" alt=""
You can see above the range of tests (from the left):
- Illustration doctype on screen/web setting.
- Ditto @300dpi.
- Photo doctype @300dpi.
- Magazine doctype @300dpi.
What went down
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1eb1/e1eb1367506fa75aa29484862f80861583a50ab1" alt=""
- Starbuck: Gav, who sought the simplicity of the fighter jock's role- just fly around and shoot things.
- William Adama: Andy, for whom a nuclear arsenal was compensation for the burdens of command.
- Chief Galen Tyrol: Dave, eschewing the complexities of politics in favour of honest sweat and toil.
- Laura Roslin: Donald, because someone has to be President, I guess.
- Helo: me, just looking for something different.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ffa/79ffaff61d00ead7653e67b4bd7e0535da1dc302" alt=""
My play didn't improve much after this bad start but I'm certainly not going to comment on that in detail because I've no intention of passing on tips that could be used against me by either side in a future game. Sufficeth to say that the humans must've had their god on their side, because they were very lucky in several ways:
They reached the jump-4 midpoint of their route to Kobol in a mere 2 jumps IIRC.
- Their first jump thereafter was a Cylon Ambush; which may have launched a Cylon attack, but it was a jump 3 which put them just 2 jumps out from home.
- Gav was able to use Starbuck's Secret Destiny to avoid a Cylon Swarm just after they'd made that penultimate jump.
- Fuel: 3.
- Food: 2.
- Morale: 1.
- Population: 6.
Score
Blind faith and dogma? 1
The appliance of science? 0
:-[
Afterthoughts
This game was more eventful than the last, with a close finish, but we were still left unsatisfied. I think there are 2 possibilities here:
- The potentialities of the procedural gameplay are as limited as I had originally feared because of my experience of Arkham Horror, so that the game has already become stereotyped and dull.
- We simply aren't playing it right; that is to say, we aren't investing enough in our tabletalk as we play, so that experiencing the limitations of bare procedural play in a game of this ilk.
Settlers of Catan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c31fa/c31fa2853a4cef8c7bc8fa7d1b06f1b18573442f" alt=""
The setup
I was red, and my setup left me feeling uncomfortable as the game began:
The final position
Unfortunately the 10's from which I'd reaped such rich rewards weren't seen again and I stalled on 7 as Gav (white) and I sought to stop Donald's (orange) advance to victory. We couldn't.
Score
Devious Donald 1Happy humans? 1
Sore loser? 0
X[
Fluxx
We rounded the session off with a few hands of Looney Labs' Fluxx. Dave was new to the game so Gav and I sang its praises to him. One feature we stressed was how tight the rules are. Ironically enough then, one of our games featured a first: a situation in which the interaction of 2 cards was more than not immediately obvious; it even remained open to question after we'd decided what we were going to do.
The 2 cards were:
The question arose because the action was played, then the new rule; did the Inflation apply to the action? Unable to rule based on the cards' text, we decided to play that it did.
I'm sure that we got it right. The burden of our confusion was that the action had already been played, so we assumed the Inflation was being applied retroactively. The precise wording on the right- first paragraph, corrects our mistake: not discarded until its instructions are completed, the action card was still in play when the new rule was played.
Score
Andy 1
Donald 3
Dave 3
Gav 2
Me 1
:-/
;)
I was red, and my setup left me feeling uncomfortable as the game began:
- With only 4 different numbers out of 6, I was in a position similar to that from which I'd suffered last month.
- I had no grain, and soon lost all hope of gaining access to it.
- My first settlement was a 3:1 port.
- I finally remembered to build that quick first city.
- A series of foruitous dice rolls let me build a couple of quick roads and a settlement so that I became a potential ore magnate.
Unfortunately the 10's from which I'd reaped such rich rewards weren't seen again and I stalled on 7 as Gav (white) and I sought to stop Donald's (orange) advance to victory. We couldn't.
Score
Devious Donald 1Happy humans? 1
Sore loser? 0
X[
Fluxx
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44034/44034a9f5317b46e0bd089c0cabc020136c2bcce" alt=""
The 2 cards were:
- Action, Draw 3, play 2 of them.
- New rule, Inflation: X=X+1, where X is any numeral.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce72c/ce72c0418a05d39a2cf9cf6675d5119801ed7f05" alt=""
I'm sure that we got it right. The burden of our confusion was that the action had already been played, so we assumed the Inflation was being applied retroactively. The precise wording on the right- first paragraph, corrects our mistake: not discarded until its instructions are completed, the action card was still in play when the new rule was played.
Score
Andy 1
Donald 3
Dave 3
Gav 2
Me 1
:-/
;)
Related@RD/KA!
Battlestar Galactica boardgame:
- My 2009 gaming wishlist #2
- Done down by dastardly Donald's devious duplicity!
- The fickle finger of fate
- Toasters, toasters, everywhere!
- A moment to marvel at...
- What price survival?
- Again, the toasters' offensive
No comments:
Post a Comment